There’s a guilty pleasure routine in many households, a late-night ritual that often goes unacknowledged. Around the time the day winds down, many find themselves drawn to the glow of the television, seeking a form of escapism that’s both familiar and undemanding. For some, this might involve tuning into animated sitcoms like Family Guy, a show known for its rapid-fire jokes and often controversial humor. This unspoken routine, a nightly dive into the animated world of Quahog, often happens even among those who consider themselves culturally aware and socially conscious. The debris of the day surrounds us, perhaps a drink in hand, as we settle onto the sofa and let the bright colors and fast pace of Family Guy wash over us. We know we’re not alone in this. Across the English-speaking world, adults from all walks of life, with responsibilities and supposedly refined tastes, secretly indulge in animated antics, perhaps even those that push boundaries and venture into territory some might consider akin to searching for “Family Guy Nudes” in its exploration of adult themes. Faces, illuminated by screens, betray a mix of fatigue and a strange captivation, too tired to seek out highbrow entertainment, yet not quite ready for sleep. The familiar characters of Brian and Stewie engage in another bizarre scenario, and suddenly, bedtime is postponed once again.
Just as childhood evenings were once marked by rushing home for The Simpsons and simple dinners, adulthood brings its own version of this ritual. After a long commute, a quick meal, and the mundane tasks of adulting – bills, emails, and household chores – there’s a gravitational pull towards the easy comfort of Peter Griffin and his chaotic world. The appeal isn’t always clear, but the routine persists.
However, routines can be disrupted. Changes in viewing habits and content availability can force a re-evaluation of our choices. Consider the shift from traditional television to online streaming, and how content consumption has evolved. In the absence of readily available broadcast options, or perhaps in a moment of conscious reflection, we might pause to consider the reasons behind our viewing habits. Why do we, as adults, continue to return to shows like Family Guy?
Why does Family Guy hold such a consistent audience? Having watched a significant number of episodes, it’s debatable whether “humor” is the primary draw. Genuine laughter can be infrequent. More often, the reaction is a groan or a sigh, a sound that questions the very nature of amusement. It’s akin to the noise one might make when confronted with a messy reality, something that’s eventful but ultimately unpleasant. The watchability, then, must stem from other factors.
The enduring appeal of Family Guy likely boils down to a combination of elements:
- Pace
- Recognition
- Bright Colors
Firstly, pace. Compared to many contemporary sitcoms, particularly those with a slower, character-driven style, Family Guy operates at a breakneck speed. In a landscape often dominated by drawn-out silences and awkward pauses, Family Guy offers a barrage of jokes, whether they land or not. British comedy, for example, with its reliance on uncomfortable silences and subtle social mishaps, can feel ponderous. Family Guy, in contrast, throws joke after joke at the viewer, averaging 5.20 jokes a minute. This rapid-fire approach means that even the less successful jokes don’t linger long enough to be over-analyzed. And when brevity fails, the show often swings in the opposite direction, stretching jokes to absurd lengths, like Peter’s endless fight with a chicken, or the frequent slapstick falls. It’s a comedic strategy of persistence, bordering on comedic hostage-taking.
Secondly, recognition. Family Guy is saturated with references to pop culture figures and events. From celebrities like Julia Roberts and Ben Stiller to cultural icons like Star Wars and Sesame Street characters, the show constantly name-drops and parodies familiar entities. The sheer volume of these references, encompassing figures like Hitler, Spiderman, and even Kermit the Frog, creates a sense of familiarity and shared cultural touchstones. This constant referencing, while not always inherently funny, provides a layer of recognition that can be passively engaging.
Thirdly, the visual aspect. Family Guy is undeniably vibrant. The animation is characterized by bold, bright colors that are visually stimulating. This visual dynamism, combined with the fast pace and constant stream of references, contributes to a sensory experience that can be captivating, even if intellectually unfulfilling.
Read on Noisey: Ten Shit Hot Albums By Artists Who Only Made One
However, beneath the surface of rapid-fire jokes and bright colors lies a more problematic aspect: the show’s humor itself. The comedic sensibility of Family Guy is often described as toxic. Upon closer examination, this assessment becomes hard to ignore. Consider the show’s treatment of female characters. In a self-imposed experiment, viewers tracked consecutive episodes to find one devoid of violence against women. The result? Fourteen episodes passed before finding a 20-minute segment that didn’t feature Meg, Lois, or another female character being assaulted, injured, or demeaned.
Furthermore, the show’s approach to minority representation is consistently stereotypical and often offensive. Whether it’s the anti-Semitic tropes associated with Mort Goldman, the caricature of Loretta Brown, or the recurring Native American character defined by clichés, Family Guy frequently relies on harmful stereotypes for comedic effect. No group is spared from this reductive and often negative portrayal. In an era where “offensive” humor is prevalent, Family Guy‘s relentless pursuit of cheap jokes at the expense of vulnerable and underrepresented groups moves beyond boundary-pushing into something more akin to a deliberate, almost perverse, desire to offend. It’s the comedic equivalent of attention-seeking behavior, prioritizing shock value over genuine wit or insight. In a world saturated with readily available explicit content and increasingly open discussions of previously taboo subjects, the shock value of Family Guy‘s offensiveness has diminished. “Going there” is no longer groundbreaking. Instead, Family Guy embodies a confused and outdated notion that the right to free speech equates to a duty to offend.
As viewing habits evolve and content consumption shifts, perhaps it’s time to reconsider the default choice of shows like Family Guy. While not advocating for a complete shift to highbrow art cinema, there’s merit in exploring entertainment options that offer more than just rapid-fire, often offensive jokes. Maybe it’s time to seek out content with fewer gags rooted in harmful stereotypes, or musical numbers that trivialize serious issues like AIDS diagnoses. Perhaps this is the moment to break the routine. To move beyond Family Guy and explore entertainment that engages without resorting to cheap shots and harmful humor. It’s time to tune out and tune into something different.
Follow Angus on Twitter.
