The concept of “familiar locations” on iPhones has become a point of contention for users concerned about privacy and control over their devices. While Apple implements this feature with the intention of enhancing security, particularly through Stolen Device Protection, the current execution is causing frustration for a segment of its user base. To understand this frustration, it’s crucial to delve into what “familiar locations” are supposed to be and why the inability to manually manage them is sparking debate.
Familiar locations are essentially locations that your iPhone learns over time based on your usage patterns. Apple’s system automatically detects places you frequent, such as your home, workplace, or other regular spots. The purpose of this feature, especially in the context of Stolen Device Protection, is to add an extra layer of security when your iPhone is in an unfamiliar location. For instance, when certain sensitive actions are performed in an unfamiliar location, like changing your Apple ID password or disabling Find My iPhone, a security delay is triggered to prevent unauthorized access in case of theft.
However, the core of the issue lies in Apple’s decision to make this “familiar locations” list entirely automatic and opaque to the user. Currently, there is no direct way for users to view, edit, or manually add locations to their “familiar” list. This lack of user control is the primary source of complaints, as highlighted by a user expressing their intent to switch to Android if this issue isn’t addressed.
One major point of contention is the assumption that Apple’s automated system accurately identifies familiar locations for all users. For individuals with rural addresses, those who live a mobile lifestyle (e.g., on a boat or RV), or those who frequently use VPNs for privacy or work, the automatic detection can be unreliable. As the original article points out, “Having a rural address, or a mobile address on boat or RV, or using a VPN, is a right for citizens, as well as privacy.” These legitimate scenarios can lead to situations where users are constantly treated as being in “unfamiliar locations” by their own devices, triggering unnecessary security delays and hindering usability.
The frustration is further amplified by the feeling of being penalized for prioritizing privacy. Disabling location services or using VPNs, actions taken to protect personal data, ironically can lead to a poorer user experience within Apple’s ecosystem due to the rigid implementation of “familiar locations.” The user argues, “Even using a VPN, and disabling all location options, and Stolen Device Protection: The waiting time will be triggered by having an empty familiar location list.” This creates a paradoxical situation where enhanced privacy measures result in reduced device functionality.
The original article also touches upon the business motivations behind this approach, suggesting that “Access to clients location and privacy DOES bring business benefits.” While location data can be valuable for various business purposes, the user argues that technical limitations are not the real obstacle. Instead, it’s a matter of “WILL” on Apple’s part to prioritize user control and address these issues. Drawing a parallel to the WhatsApp privacy controversy, the user implies that ignoring user concerns can lead to user migration to alternative platforms.
Ultimately, the user’s core demand is for Apple to grant users the ability to manually manage their “familiar locations.” This would empower users to accurately define their familiar spaces, regardless of their living situation or privacy preferences, and avoid unwarranted security delays. It’s a call for a balance between security and user autonomy, advocating for a system that respects user rights and diverse lifestyles without compromising device usability. The question remains whether Apple will heed these concerns and adapt its approach to “familiar locations” to better serve its user base.
